Staying Put, for Now

In March, the S&P 500 had a fitting finish to its best quarter since 1998. The index rose 3.3% during the month. Our domestic equities rose nearly 5.0%. Developed international equity markets, on the other hand, fell forty-six basis points, while our international positioning rose by a similar amount.

The U.S. equity market’s recent ascent has further stretched valuations. By our estimates, the S&P 500 is priced to return an average 4.6% per year over the next decade. The expectation for such paltry returns is due to elevated multiples of earnings on current record-high profit margins and low dividend yields.

Remember that we do not own the “market”. In fact, we hold less than 5% of the number of companies that the S&P 500 contains. Our domestic equities yield more, have superior returns on invested capital, have equivalent growth prospects, and unlike the S&P 500, they trade at a discount to their historical multiples as well as their intrinsic worth. Our portfolio’s expected return is twice that of the S&P 500. The conviction of our current positioning is also supported by a currently growing economy.

In most of the world, consumers are spending, employers are hiring, and central banks are more than accommodative. While economic growth is tepid, it is nonetheless positive. Put simply, leading indicators continue to signal growth. The Eurozone, however, remains the largest threat. Europe’s austerity is dampening worldwide prospects and a renewed credit crisis could cripple the world economy. Investors have been rather lenient with the region and supplied much needed time to recapitalize, but like our positioning, that could change overnight.

For now, we are maintaining our current positioning.

February 2012 Investor Commentary

February brought with it yet another strong month of equity performance. Since September of last year, the market has moved in a near-vertical fashion to multi-year highs, returning nearly 22% for the 500 largest U.S. stocks. Our domestic equity portfolios have risen an impressive 18% to 22%–depending on the mandate–over that same time frame. Our since-inception equity performance is ahead with less volatility and risk.

The recent ascent in equity markets is welcomed, but investors must remember that today’s price will largely determine the future return. As of today, the S&P 500 is trading for over 16x 2011 earnings, which happened to be the highest on record. The market is also trading for nearly 14x future earnings, as estimates for 2012 are nearly a $100 per share. The typical forward multiple is somewhere between 12 and 14, depending on the dataset used, so even assuming the actual attainment of $100 per share earnings, the market is already paying for them in advance.

Of course, the analyst forecasts that derive the $100 2012 estimate assume further expansion in already-record-high profit margins. This is becoming increasingly unlikely, given improving hiring (falling real labor costs have buoyed profit margins) and rising energy costs, both of which should stymie profit margin expansion. We’ve been here before, as the same individuals that said the market was cheap in 2007 on similar logic are doing so today.

Equity market valuations are not in bubble territory, but they are rich and thus the prospective 10-year return for stocks is lower than average. By our estimates, the S&P 500 will likely deliver average annual returns below 5% over the next decade. The analysis of this is quite simple. Profit margins are already at or near their long-term highs, so profit growth depends on revenue growth, not expanding margins. In fact, the likely reality is that margins will contract over the next decade. The current multiple of 16.1x is already above the long-term average of 15x, so there will likely be no multiple expansion over the next decade either. The S&P 500 is yielding just over 2%, which is comparable to 10-year Treasuries at this time, but is paltry by any long-term standard. Add that all together and you get a sub-5% expected future average annual return. If the world economy, and the U.S. in particular, is in for a “new normal” of slower GDP growth, then returns could be even lower.

A rising market not only changes the future expected return, it also changes the opportunity set available to investors. That is to say, finding securities with a suitable margin of safety is getting more difficult. Financials remain the best value, barring another destabilizing recession, while oil-related energy picks are becoming pricy. Our domestic equity portfolios continue to trade at a reasonable discount to fair value, but the gap is closing, and with it, our comfort-inducing margin of safety.

We think it also bears stating that a market’s ascent makes the investing landscape more risky. This fact, though counter-intuitive to most, is no less true. As equity markets rise, valuations increase and there is less margin of safety for investors. This is as basic as 2 + 2 = 4. Yet, the typical investor draws comfort in a rising market and ultimately becomes complacent. Fear of losing money is replaced by a fear of missing out on further upside. Of course, rich valuations are a staple of equity market tops, and are quickly reversed when the economic landscape changes for the worse.

Economic data continues to indicate a slowly growing economy. Employment is up, real retail sales continue to outstrip inflation, housing investment is growing and manufacturing remains firm. There are a few weak spots, including falling real wages, soft port and rail traffic, and a deceleration in manufacturing hiring. But the Black Cypress proprietary macro model continues to signal expansion and therefore equity market exposure.

We are maintaining our current positioning at this time.

The Irrationality of Politics – Video of Interest

There is a fantastic TED video (h/t: Marginal Revolution) discussing political irrationality that you should take the time to watch. It’s about 15 minutes.

This video is fascinating from a political viewpoint, but it is also highly relevant from an investing perspective.

How do you know if you might be irrational regarding a particular belief?

  1. You become angry when someone discusses their differing viewpoint (this shows personal bias that may be preventing you from even considering another point of view)
  2. You have strong opinions about a subject before acquiring relevant evidence (this is one of the most frequently made mistakes and also one of the more difficult to correct because it is typically accompanied by point 3
  3. Your opinion does not change as you gather said relevant and evidence contrary to your belief (dogmatism and fitting new information–even conflicting information–into your existing beliefs)
  4. You only seek sources of information that agree with your existing opinion
  5. You believe people who disagree with you are evil

We must always be mindful of our inherent biases or we risk making very large investment mistakes.

Take the 1960s. Investors disregarded valuation and built a list, deemed the nifty fifty, of stocks that were believed to be impervious to decline. You could buy the nifty fifty at any price. These stocks declined precipitously in the 1970s and significantly underperformed the market for the next decade.

Stocks are not always priced for the “long haul”, dividends may cushion a decline but it won’t be any less painful (the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index fell 52% from 2007 to 2009, compared to the S&P 500’s 57% decline), the world is not ending, and it’s not different this time.

Check out the video here (link):